Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Judy Walker Reynolds Kelli Lynn Reynolds v. David Melvin Reynolds, 92-1235 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-1235 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jul. 08, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 968 F.2d 1211 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Judy Walker Reynolds; Kelli Lynn Reynolds, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. David Melvin REYNOLDS, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-1235. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: May 12, 1992 Decided: July 8, 1992 Appeal fro
More

968 F.2d 1211

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Judy Walker Reynolds; Kelli Lynn Reynolds, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
David Melvin REYNOLDS, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 92-1235.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 12, 1992
Decided: July 8, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-91-769-5-CIV-B)

Judy Walker Reynolds, Kelli Lynn Reynolds, Appellants Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED

Before RUSSELL and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

1

Judy Walker Reynolds and Kelli Lynn Reynolds appeal from the district court's order dismissing their complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Reynolds v. Reynolds, No. CA-91-769-5-CIV-B (E.D.N.C. Nov. 27, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer