Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Daniel Monroe Flowers v. D. G. Underwood Roanoke City Police Department, 92-7046 (1992)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 92-7046 Visitors: 17
Filed: Dec. 23, 1992
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 983 F.2d 1056 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Daniel Monroe FLOWERS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. D. G. UNDERWOOD; Roanoke City Police Department, Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-7046. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: November 30, 1992 Decided: December 2
More

983 F.2d 1056

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Daniel Monroe FLOWERS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
D. G. UNDERWOOD; Roanoke City Police Department,
Respondents-Appellees.

No. 92-7046.

United States Court of Appeals,
Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 30, 1992
Decided: December 23, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Chief District Judge. (CA-92-660-R)

Daniel Monroe Flowers, Appellant Pro Se.

W.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Daniel Monroe Flowers seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C.s 2254 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Flowers v. Underwood, No. CA-92-660-R (W.D. Va. Sept. 28, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer