Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Kenneth Randall Harley, 93-6565 (1994)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 93-6565 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 12, 1994
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 14 F.3d 597 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee, v. Kenneth Randall HARLEY, Defendant Appellant. No. 93-6565. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted: Dec. 16, 1993 Decided: Jan. 12, 1994. Appeal from the United Stat
More

14 F.3d 597
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Kenneth Randall HARLEY, Defendant Appellant.

No. 93-6565.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Dec. 16, 1993
Decided: Jan. 12, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Richard C. Erwin, Senior District Judge. (CR-88-42-16-D, CA-92-563-1)

Kenneth Randall Harley, appellant pro se.

Benjamin H. White, Jr., United States Attorney, Greensboro, NC for appellee.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINS, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Harley, Nos. CR-88-42-16-D; CA-92-563-1 (M.D.N.C. Apr. 7, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer