Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

95-6670 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6670 Visitors: 17
Filed: Aug. 14, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 64 F.3d 658 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Terry W. MANESS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. T. Travis MEDLOCK, Attorney General for South Carolina; Michael J. Cavanaugh, Commissioner, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole, and Pardon, Defendants-Appellees. No. 95-6670
More

64 F.3d 658

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Terry W. MANESS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
T. Travis MEDLOCK, Attorney General for South Carolina;
Michael J. Cavanaugh, Commissioner, South Carolina
Department of Probation, Parole, and
Pardon, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 95-6670.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 25, 1995.
Decided Aug. 14, 1995.

Terry W. Maness, appellant pro se. Alice Clay Broadwater, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, Columbia, SC; Carl Norman Lundberg, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF PROBATION, PAROLE & PARDON SERVICES, Columbia, SC, for appellees.

Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Maness v. Medlock, No. CA-92-1429-7-22BC (D.S.C. Apr. 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer