Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hassan Sabir v. State of North Carolina Randy E. Lee, Superintendent of Caledonia Correctional Institution, 95-6701 (1995)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 95-6701 Visitors: 55
Filed: Nov. 28, 1995
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 70 F.3d 1263 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Hassan SABIR, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE of North Carolina; Randy E. Lee, Superintendent of Caledonia Correctional Institution, Respondents-Appellees. No. 95-6701. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted
More

70 F.3d 1263

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Hassan SABIR, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
STATE of North Carolina; Randy E. Lee, Superintendent of
Caledonia Correctional Institution, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 95-6701.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: November 16, 1995.
Decided: November 28, 1995.

Hassan Sabir, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Norwood League, Michael F. Easley, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

Before MICHAEL and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Sabir v. North Carolina, No. CA-94-26-2 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 21, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer