Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Melanie Wooden v. Willie Mae Oliver City of Norfolk, 96-1323 (1996)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 96-1323 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 28, 1996
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 91 F.3d 136 NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit. Melanie WOODEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Willie Mae OLIVER; City of Norfolk, Defendants-Appellees. No. 96-1323. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Submitted June 20, 1996. Decided June 28, 1996. Melanie Wooden, App
More

91 F.3d 136

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Melanie WOODEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Willie Mae OLIVER; City of Norfolk, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 96-1323.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 20, 1996.
Decided June 28, 1996.

Melanie Wooden, Appellant Pro Se.

Before HALL, WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing her multiple civil claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d) (1988). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wooden v. Oliver, No. CA-96-244-2 (E.D.Va. Mar. 1, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer