Filed: Apr. 04, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2421 In re: EDNA GORHAM BEY, a/k/a Ghyllian Bell, a/k/a Edna Gorham, a/k/a Edna Rosser-El, a/k/a Jateyah Ali, a/k/a Edna Bey, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (8:06-cr-00260-RWT-1; 8:11-cv-03238-RWT) Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: April 4, 2013 Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edna Gorham Bey, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2421 In re: EDNA GORHAM BEY, a/k/a Ghyllian Bell, a/k/a Edna Gorham, a/k/a Edna Rosser-El, a/k/a Jateyah Ali, a/k/a Edna Bey, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (8:06-cr-00260-RWT-1; 8:11-cv-03238-RWT) Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: April 4, 2013 Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edna Gorham Bey, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not b..
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2421 In re: EDNA GORHAM BEY, a/k/a Ghyllian Bell, a/k/a Edna Gorham, a/k/a Edna Rosser-El, a/k/a Jateyah Ali, a/k/a Edna Bey, Petitioner. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (8:06-cr-00260-RWT-1; 8:11-cv-03238-RWT) Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: April 4, 2013 Before DUNCAN, DAVIS, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. Edna Gorham Bey, Petitioner Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Edna Gorham Bey petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on her 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2012) motion. She seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the court denied Bey’s § 2255 motion by order entered on February 26, 2013. Accordingly, because the district court has recently decided Bey’s case, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny as moot the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. PETITION DENIED 2
