Filed: Apr. 22, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2473 ALVIN DARDEN; DIANE DARDEN, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. THE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT, d/b/a Travelers, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00188-JAG-MHL) Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 22, 2013 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirme
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 12-2473 ALVIN DARDEN; DIANE DARDEN, Plaintiffs – Appellants, v. THE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT, d/b/a Travelers, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr., District Judge. (3:12-cv-00188-JAG-MHL) Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 22, 2013 Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 12-2473
ALVIN DARDEN; DIANE DARDEN,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
THE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY OF HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT,
d/b/a Travelers,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. John A. Gibney, Jr.,
District Judge. (3:12-cv-00188-JAG-MHL)
Submitted: April 18, 2013 Decided: April 22, 2013
Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Alvin Darden, Diane Darden, Appellants Pro Se. Craig David
Roswell, Michael David Stallings, NILES, BARTON & WILMER, LLP,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Alvin and Diane Darden appeal the district court’s
order entering judgment following a jury trial. The record does
not contain a transcript of trial proceedings. An appellant has
the burden of including in the record on appeal a transcript of
all parts of the proceedings material to the issues raised on
appeal. Fed. R. App. P. 10(b); 4th Cir. R. 10(c). By failing
to produce a transcript or to qualify for the production of a
transcript at government expense, the Dardens have waived review
of the issues on appeal that depend upon the transcript to show
error. See generally Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); Keller v. Prince
George’s Cnty.,
827 F.2d 952, 954 n.1 (4th Cir. 1987). As no
error appears on the record before us, we affirm the district
court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
2