Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Andre Saint-Jean, 13-6249 (2013)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Number: 13-6249 Visitors: 81
Filed: Apr. 26, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6249 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ANDRE FERNE SAINT-JEAN, a/k/a Dre, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (5:06-cr-00038-GEC-7) Submitted: April 17, 2013 Decided: April 26, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre Fe
More
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 13-6249 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff – Appellee, v. ANDRE FERNE SAINT-JEAN, a/k/a Dre, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (5:06-cr-00038-GEC-7) Submitted: April 17, 2013 Decided: April 26, 2013 Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Andre Ferne Saint-Jean, Appellant Pro SE. Joseph W.H. Mott, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Roanoke, Virginia; Jeb Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Andre Ferne Saint-Jean appeals the district court’s order denying, for want of jurisdiction, his motion for reconsideration of an order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Saint-Jean, No. 5:06-cr-00038-GEC-7 (W.D. Va. Feb. 8, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 2
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer