Filed: Feb. 22, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7278 CHARLES SERGIO HAGLER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GERALDINE MIRO, Warden; G. BEST, Lieutenant; BETSY E. ALBRITTON, Captain; A. VAUGHN, Cor- rectional Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-95-1471-2-22AJ) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 22, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 95-7278 CHARLES SERGIO HAGLER, JR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus GERALDINE MIRO, Warden; G. BEST, Lieutenant; BETSY E. ALBRITTON, Captain; A. VAUGHN, Cor- rectional Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (CA-95-1471-2-22AJ) Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 22, 1996 Before MURNAGHAN and ..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 95-7278
CHARLES SERGIO HAGLER, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
GERALDINE MIRO, Warden; G. BEST, Lieutenant;
BETSY E. ALBRITTON, Captain; A. VAUGHN, Cor-
rectional Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Cameron McGowan Currie, District
Judge. (CA-95-1471-2-22AJ)
Submitted: February 7, 1996 Decided: February 22, 1996
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Charles Sergio Hagler, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
relief without prejudice on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1988) complaint.
We dismiss the appeal based upon our decision in Domino Sugar Corp.
v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392,
10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir.
1993). Dismissals without prejudice are not appealable if the
Appellant could save the action by amending the complaint. Because
Hagler could amend to allege a significant mental or physical in-
jury, the dismissal without prejudice is not appealable. See id. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
2