Filed: Mar. 19, 1998
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2020
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7598 TON JULIUS THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EARL BESHEARS, Warden; EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; GEORGIA PERDUE, R.N.; RAZAAK ENIOLA, Dr.; DALE KERSHOW, Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-406-JFM) Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 19, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, an
Summary: UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-7598 TON JULIUS THOMAS, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus EARL BESHEARS, Warden; EASTERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; GEORGIA PERDUE, R.N.; RAZAAK ENIOLA, Dr.; DALE KERSHOW, Officer, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-97-406-JFM) Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 19, 1998 Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and..
More
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 97-7598
TON JULIUS THOMAS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
EARL BESHEARS, Warden; EASTERN CORRECTIONAL
INSTITUTION; GEORGIA PERDUE, R.N.; RAZAAK
ENIOLA, Dr.; DALE KERSHOW, Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
(CA-97-406-JFM)
Submitted: February 26, 1998 Decided: March 19, 1998
Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ton Julius Thomas, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., At-
torney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland; Joseph Barry Chazen, Gina Marie
Smith, MEYERS, BILLINGSLEY, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, P.A., Riverdale,
Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
court. Thomas v. Beshears, No. CA-97-406-JFM (D. Md. Oct. 1, 1997).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal conten-
tions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2