UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 97-2125 LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR., Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DONNA E. SHALALA, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; BRUCE VLADECK, Administrator, Department of Health and Human Services (Wash- ington) Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) (Baltimore); DAVE BARRAIN, Administra- tor, United States General Services Adminis- tration; FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE; STEVE PELOVITZ, Health Care Financing Administra- tion; REGINA MCPHILLIPS, Health Care Financing Administration; ROBERT MOORE, Health Care Financing Administration; JOE HLADKY, Health Care Financing Administration; WINSTON EDWARDS, Health Care Financing Administration; FRANK JONES, Health Care Financing Administra- tion; JANICE SIEBERT, Health Care Financing Administration; PATRICIA WALDRON, Health Care Financing Administration; MEL GENT, Health Care Financing Administration; ARNIE KAHN, Health Care Financing Administration; KERMIT LEE, Health Care Financing Administration; GEORGE WILSON, Health Care Financing Adminis- tration; DAVID ZANARDELLI, Health Care Fi- nancing Administration; DAVID SMITH, Health Care Financing Administration; ALAN ZENDELL, Health Care Financing Administration; ROD- DERICK LOCKLEAR, Health Care Financing Administration; JOANNE HITCHCOCK, Health Care Financing Administration; MAURICE GRAHAM, Special Agent, General Services Administra- tion; RONALD REJA, Special Agent, General Services Administration, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA- 97-2448-S) Submitted: July 2, 1998 Decided: July 16, 1998 Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and HALL, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lawrence Verline Wilder, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). 2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint alleging that he was the victim of defamation, harass- ment, retaliation, denial of promotion, and wrongful termination by his employer. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Wilder v. Shalala, No. CA-97-2448- S (D. Md. Aug. 14, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma- terials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED 3