Case: 12-10420       Document: 00512346905         Page: 1     Date Filed: 08/20/2013




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                          August 20, 2013
                                     No. 12-10420
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

ANDRES REYNA-MARES, also known as Andres Reyna Mares,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Northern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 4:11-CR-149-1


Before HIGGINBOTHAM, SMITH, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The attorney appointed to represent Andres Reyna-Mares has moved for
leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 

 (5th Cir. 2011).
Reyna-Mares has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the
relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Reyna-Mares’s
response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 12-10420   Document: 00512346905    Page: 2   Date Filed: 08/20/2013

                               No. 12-10420

to withdraw is GRANTED, Reyna-Mares’s motion to have William R. Biggs
appointed as his counsel is DENIED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                    2