Case: 13-30194       Document: 00512419458         Page: 1     Date Filed: 10/25/2013




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                            FILED
                                                                         October 25, 2013
                                     No. 13-30194
                                  Conference Calendar                      Lyle W. Cayce
                                                                                Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                  Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

FREDDIE FRANCIS, JR.,

                                                  Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeals from the United States District Court
                       for the Western District of Louisiana
                            USDC No. 2:99-CR-20028-9


Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Freddie Francis, Jr.,
has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders
v. California, 

 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 

 (5th
Cir. 2011). Francis has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and
the relevant portions of the record reflected therein, as well as Francis’s
response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no
nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 13-30194   Document: 00512419458   Page: 2   Date Filed: 10/25/2013

                              No. 13-30194

to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities
herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                    2