Filed: Oct. 25, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: Case: 13-10104 Document: 00512419684 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 25, 2013 No. 13-10104 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ARMANDO PAREDES-MUNOZ, also known as Ramon Paredes, also known as Armando Padres, Defendant-Appellant c/w No. 13-10108 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ARMANDO PAREDES-MUNOZ, Defendant-App
Summary: Case: 13-10104 Document: 00512419684 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 25, 2013 No. 13-10104 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ARMANDO PAREDES-MUNOZ, also known as Ramon Paredes, also known as Armando Padres, Defendant-Appellant c/w No. 13-10108 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. ARMANDO PAREDES-MUNOZ, Defendant-Appe..
More
Case: 13-10104 Document: 00512419684 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 25, 2013
No. 13-10104
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ARMANDO PAREDES-MUNOZ, also known as Ramon Paredes, also known as
Armando Padres,
Defendant-Appellant
c/w No. 13-10108
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
ARMANDO PAREDES-MUNOZ,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:12-CR-125-1
USDC No. 4:12-CR-143-1
Case: 13-10104 Document: 00512419684 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/25/2013
No. 13-10104
c/w No. 13-10108
Before JOLLY, JONES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Armando
Paredes-Munoz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in
accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v.
Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Paredes-Munoz has not filed a response.
We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record
reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that these consolidated
appeals present no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from
further responsibilities herein, and the APPEALS ARE DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
2