Filed: Aug. 26, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-60605 Summary Calendar JOSE DANIEL GARAY, Petitioner, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A70-693-867 - August 24, 1999 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jose Daniel Garay petitions this court to review an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal seeking reversal
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 98-60605 Summary Calendar JOSE DANIEL GARAY, Petitioner, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A70-693-867 - August 24, 1999 Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jose Daniel Garay petitions this court to review an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal seeking reversal ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 98-60605
Summary Calendar
JOSE DANIEL GARAY,
Petitioner,
versus
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
Respondent.
--------------------
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A70-693-867
--------------------
August 24, 1999
Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Jose Daniel Garay petitions this court to review an order of
the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal
seeking reversal of an order of deportation denying his
applications for political asylum and withholding of deportation.
We have reviewed the record and the briefs and determine that the
BIA’s denials of Garay’s applications for asylum and withholding
of deportation are supported by substantial evidence. Faddoul v.
INS,
37 F.3d 185, 188 (5th Cir. 1994).
The petition for review is DENIED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.