Filed: Aug. 30, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-40130 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSÉ LUIS SANCHEZ-ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-98-CR-289-1 - - - - - - - - - - August 27, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent José Luis Sanchez-Orti
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-40130 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JOSÉ LUIS SANCHEZ-ORTIZ, Defendant-Appellant. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-98-CR-289-1 - - - - - - - - - - August 27, 1999 Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent José Luis Sanchez-Ortiz..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 99-40130
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JOSÉ LUIS SANCHEZ-ORTIZ,
Defendant-Appellant.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. M-98-CR-289-1
- - - - - - - - - -
August 27, 1999
Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent José Luis
Sanchez-Ortiz has filed a brief as required by Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Sanchez-Ortiz has filed no
response. Our independent review of the brief and the record
discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R.
47.5.4.
