Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Thibeaux v. TX Dept Cr Justice, 99-10495 (1999)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 99-10495 Visitors: 52
Filed: Dec. 16, 1999
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 99-10495 Conference Calendar RAYFIELD JOSEPH THIBEAUX, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; CHRISTINE JOHNSON, Defendants-Appellees. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 2:99-CV-103 - December 16, 1999 Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Rayfield Joseph Thibeaux moves for leave to appeal in f
More
               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                       FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT



                           No. 99-10495
                        Conference Calendar



RAYFIELD JOSEPH THIBEAUX,

                                          Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE,
INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; CHRISTINE JOHNSON,

                                          Defendants-Appellees.

                      --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Northern District of Texas
                      USDC No. 2:99-CV-103
                      --------------------

                          December 16, 1999

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Rayfield Joseph Thibeaux moves for leave to appeal in forma

pauperis (IFP).   The district court properly dismissed Thibeaux’s

civil rights suit based in part on an outstanding $50 sanction

issued by the United States District Court for the Southern

District of Texas.    See Balawajder v. Scott, 
160 F.3d 1066
, 1067-

68 (5th Cir. 1998).

     The appeal is thus frivolous and IFP is DENIED.    See Jackson

v. Dallas Police Dep't, 
811 F.2d 260
, 261 (5th Cir. 1986).

     *
        Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
                           No. 99-10495
                                -2-

Because it is frivolous, the appeal is DISMISSED.   See 5TH CIR.

R. 42.2.

     IFP DENIED.   APPEAL DISMISSED.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer