Filed: Feb. 13, 2001
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-10119 _ ROY TRUJILLO, JR., THE ESTATE OF ROY TRUJILLO, JR., DECEASED; ROY TRUJILLO, SR., Representative of the Estate of Roy Trujillo, Jr., Deceased; DEBBIE TRUJILLO, Representative of the Estate of Roy Trujillo, Jr., Deceased; MARTHA ALICIA ORTIZ, Individually and on behalf of Roy Ricardo Trujillo III, on behalf of Adam Alexander Trujillo, on behalf of the Estate of Roy Trujillo, Jr., Deceased; MARY MONCIBIAZ, Individually and
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 00-10119 _ ROY TRUJILLO, JR., THE ESTATE OF ROY TRUJILLO, JR., DECEASED; ROY TRUJILLO, SR., Representative of the Estate of Roy Trujillo, Jr., Deceased; DEBBIE TRUJILLO, Representative of the Estate of Roy Trujillo, Jr., Deceased; MARTHA ALICIA ORTIZ, Individually and on behalf of Roy Ricardo Trujillo III, on behalf of Adam Alexander Trujillo, on behalf of the Estate of Roy Trujillo, Jr., Deceased; MARY MONCIBIAZ, Individually and ..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
______________
No. 00-10119
______________
ROY TRUJILLO, JR., THE ESTATE OF ROY TRUJILLO, JR.,
DECEASED; ROY TRUJILLO, SR., Representative of the
Estate of Roy Trujillo, Jr., Deceased; DEBBIE TRUJILLO,
Representative of the Estate of Roy Trujillo, Jr.,
Deceased; MARTHA ALICIA ORTIZ, Individually and on
behalf of Roy Ricardo Trujillo III, on behalf of Adam
Alexander Trujillo, on behalf of the Estate of Roy
Trujillo, Jr., Deceased; MARY MONCIBIAZ, Individually
and on behalf of the Estate of Roy Trujillo, Jr.,
Deceased, on behalf of Mary Alice Trujillo,
Plaintiffs-Appellees,
versus
STEVEN G. O’BRIEN; ET AL.,
Defendants,
STEVEN G. O’BRIEN,
Defendant-Appellant.
---------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:98-CV-1669-H
February 13, 2001
Before GARWOOD, PARKER, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Roy Trujillo, Jr., filed this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights
suit against appellant Steven G. O’Brien, a Dallas police officer,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
and other defendants, alleging that O’Brien used excessive force
when effecting an arrest of him. O’Brien filed a motion for
summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity. The district
court refused to grant that motion, and this appeal followed.
District court orders denying summary judgment on the basis of
qualified immunity are immediately appealable under the collateral
order doctrine, notwithstanding their interlocutory character, when
based on a conclusion of law. See Mitchell v. Forsyth,
472 U.S.
511, 530 (1985). Such orders are not immediately appealable,
however, if they are based on a determination that a genuine issue
of material facts exists. See Johnson v. Jones,
515 U.S. 304, 313
(1995). Because the district court’s ruling was based on a
determination that significant factual issues remained as to
circumstances surrounding O’Brien’s shooting and subduing of
Trujillo, this court does not have jurisdiction to review the
denial of O’Brien’s motion for summary judgment based on qualified
immunity. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED FOR LACK OF
JURISDICTION.