Filed: Feb. 25, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-10899 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus REGINALD DESHAUN WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:99-CR-88-1-C - February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Charles Lanehart, Jr., court-appointed appellate counsel for Reginald Deshaun Williams, has moved for leave to with
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-10899 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus REGINALD DESHAUN WILLIAMS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:99-CR-88-1-C - February 21, 2002 Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Charles Lanehart, Jr., court-appointed appellate counsel for Reginald Deshaun Williams, has moved for leave to withd..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-10899
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
REGINALD DESHAUN WILLIAMS,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 5:99-CR-88-1-C
--------------------
February 21, 2002
Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Charles Lanehart, Jr., court-appointed appellate counsel for
Reginald Deshaun Williams, has moved for leave to withdraw and
has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S.
738 (1967). Willlams has not responded to the motion. Our
independent review of the brief and the record discloses no
nonfrivolous issue.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No.
-2-
Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.