Filed: Mar. 08, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-60005 TORRES-VARGAS BALTAZAR, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A91-019-863 - March 7, 2002 Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Torres-Vargas Baltazar petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) holding that Baltazar’s state conviction for felony driving while into
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-60005 TORRES-VARGAS BALTAZAR, Petitioner, versus JOHN ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent. - Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A91-019-863 - March 7, 2002 Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Torres-Vargas Baltazar petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) holding that Baltazar’s state conviction for felony driving while intox..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-60005
TORRES-VARGAS BALTAZAR,
Petitioner,
versus
JOHN ASHCROFT,
ATTORNEY GENERAL,
Respondent.
--------------------
Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
BIA No. A91-019-863
--------------------
March 7, 2002
Before REAVLEY, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Torres-Vargas Baltazar petitions for review of an order of
the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) holding that Baltazar’s
state conviction for felony driving while intoxicated was an
aggravated felony warranting his removal from this country. The
respondent and Baltazar have filed a joint motion to remand the
case to the BIA for reconsideration in light of United States v.
Chapa-Garza,
243 F.3d 921, 927 (5th Cir. 2001). Both parties
also move to withdraw the respondent’s motion to dismiss.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
No. 01-60005
-2-
Baltazar’s petition for review is GRANTED. The order of the
BIA is VACATED, and this case is REMANDED to the BIA for
disposition consistent with
Chapa-Garza, 243 F.3d at 927. All
other outstanding motions are DENIED.