Filed: Jun. 24, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 01-40782 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LEOPOLDO ALBA ONTIVEROS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Brownsville _ June 21, 2002 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing, our opinion filed April 29, 2002, in this case is WITHDRAWN. The motion for leave
Summary: UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT _ No. 01-40782 _ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. LEOPOLDO ALBA ONTIVEROS, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Brownsville _ June 21, 2002 ON PETITION FOR REHEARING Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing, our opinion filed April 29, 2002, in this case is WITHDRAWN. The motion for leave ..
More
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
__________________
No. 01-40782
__________________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
LEOPOLDO ALBA ONTIVEROS,
Defendant-Appellant.
______________________________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Texas, Brownsville
______________________________________________
June 21, 2002
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING
Before DAVIS, BENAVIDES, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Upon consideration of the petition for rehearing, our opinion filed April 29, 2002, in this case
is WITHDRAWN. The motion for leave to withdraw as counsel is GRANTED. Counsel has filed
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be
published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
a brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our review of the brief, the record,
and the response of Ontiveros disclose no non-frivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s
request to withdraw is GRANTED and the appeal is DISMISSED.