Case: 14-40144      Document: 00513093444         Page: 1    Date Filed: 06/25/2015




           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
                                                                           United States Court of Appeals

                                    No. 14-40144
                                                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                                                  FILED
                                  Summary Calendar                            June 25, 2015
                                                                             Lyle W. Cayce
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,                                                         Clerk


                                                 Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

HESSEL FERNANDO BANEGAS,

                                                 Defendant-Appellant


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                        for the Southern District of Texas
                             USDC No. 7:13-CR-1415


Before KING, PRADO, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Hessel Fernando
Banegas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance
with Anders v. California, 

(1967), and United States v. Flores, 

(5th Cir. 2011). Banegas has not filed a response. We have reviewed
counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We
concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous


       * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.
    Case: 14-40144    Document: 00513093444    Page: 2   Date Filed: 06/25/2015


                                No. 14-40144

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw
is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.




                                      2