Filed: Nov. 01, 2002
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-21300 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CESAR GONZALEZ-PALOMO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-671-ALL - October 30, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cesar Gonzalez-Palomo has moved for leave to withdraw and has fil
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 01-21300 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CESAR GONZALEZ-PALOMO, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-671-ALL - October 30, 2002 Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cesar Gonzalez-Palomo has moved for leave to withdraw and has file..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-21300
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
CESAR GONZALEZ-PALOMO,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. H-01-CR-671-ALL
--------------------
October 30, 2002
Before DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Cesar
Gonzalez-Palomo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a
brief as required by Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
Gonzalez has received copies of counsel’s motion and brief but
has not filed a response. Our independent review of counsel’s
brief and the record discloses no nonfrivolous issue.
Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.