Filed: Oct. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Case: 15-40071 Document: 00513242283 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-40071 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 22, 2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. APRIL ZALEST RAVELL, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:14-CR-5-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. P
Summary: Case: 15-40071 Document: 00513242283 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 15-40071 Conference Calendar United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 22, 2015 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Plaintiff-Appellee v. APRIL ZALEST RAVELL, Defendant-Appellant Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:14-CR-5-1 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges. PE..
More
Case: 15-40071 Document: 00513242283 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 15-40071
Conference Calendar
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 22, 2015
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
APRIL ZALEST RAVELL,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 1:14-CR-5-1
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, April Zalest Ravell raises an
argument that she concedes is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt,
586
F.3d 303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and
quantity is not an element of a 21 U.S.C. ยง 841 offense. The unopposed motion
for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court
is AFFIRMED.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH
CIR. R. 47.5.4.