Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Hernandez-Hernandez, 02-21159 (2003)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 02-21159 Visitors: 34
Filed: Jun. 24, 2003
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 24, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-21159 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARMELO HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-43-1 - Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Carmelo Hernandez-Hernandez (Hernand
More
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 24, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-21159 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus CARMELO HERNANDEZ-HERNANDEZ, Defendant-Appellant. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-01-CR-43-1 -------------------- Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Carmelo Hernandez-Hernandez (Hernandez), federal inmate # 97237-079, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to set aside the $1000 fine which was imposed after he pleaded guilty to being found present in the United States following deportation. The propriety of Hernandez’s fine is not cognizable under any postconviction motion. Because the district court was without jurisdiction to consider the motion, the district court’s denial of the motion is AFFIRMED. See United States v. Early, 27 * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-21159 -2- F.3d 140, 141 (5th Cir. 1994)(affirming district court’s denial of motion to reduce sentence on the merits on alternative basis of lack of jurisdiction).
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer