Filed: Jun. 24, 2004
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41349 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DOMINGO GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-03-CR-260-1 - Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Domingo Garcia appeals the sentence imposed fol
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004 FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-41349 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DOMINGO GARCIA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-03-CR-260-1 - Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Domingo Garcia appeals the sentence imposed foll..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS June 23, 2004
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 03-41349
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
DOMINGO GARCIA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. B-03-CR-260-1
--------------------
Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Domingo Garcia appeals the sentence imposed following his
guilty-plea conviction for being an alien unlawfully found in the
United States following deportation after having been previously
convicted of an aggravated felony, in violation of 8 U.S.C.
§ 1326. For the first time on appeal, Garcia argues that the
sentencing provisions of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are
unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey,
530 U.S. 466
(2000). Garcia acknowledges that his argument is foreclosed by
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 03-41349
-2-
Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
523 U.S. 224 (1998), but he
seeks to preserve the issue for Supreme Court review.
Apprendi did not overrule Almendarez-Torres. See
Apprendi,
530 U.S. at 489-90. Accordingly, the judgment of the district
court is AFFIRMED.