Filed: Jun. 22, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 04-20007 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JARISON MARTINEZ, also known as El Negro, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-340-1 - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 04-20007 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JARISON MARTINEZ, also known as El Negro, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-340-1 - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed t..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005
Charles R. Fulbruge III
No. 04-20007 Clerk
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JARISON MARTINEZ, also known as El Negro,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas
USDC No. 4:00-CR-340-1
--------------------
Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Counsel appointed to represent Jarison Martinez has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs as required by Anders
v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Our independent review of
counsel’s briefs, Martinez’s responses, and the record discloses
no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for
leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further
responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH
CIR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.