Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Martinez, 04-20007 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 04-20007 Visitors: 24
Filed: Jun. 22, 2005
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 22, 2005 Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 04-20007 Clerk Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JARISON MARTINEZ, also known as El Negro, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:00-CR-340-1 - Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Counsel appointed
More
                                                        United States Court of Appeals
                                                                 Fifth Circuit
                                                               F I L E D
                IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                        FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                   June 22, 2005

                                                            Charles R. Fulbruge III
                             No. 04-20007                           Clerk
                         Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                      Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JARISON MARTINEZ, also known as El Negro,

                                      Defendant-Appellant.

                       --------------------
          Appeal from the United States District Court
               for the Southern District of Texas
                     USDC No. 4:00-CR-340-1
                       --------------------

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     Counsel appointed to represent Jarison Martinez has moved

for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs as required by Anders

v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).    Our independent review of

counsel’s briefs, Martinez’s responses, and the record discloses

no nonfrivolous issue for appeal.   Accordingly, the motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.        See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.




     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer