Case: 15-31032 Document: 00513834787 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/13/2017 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED No. 15-31032 January 13, 2017 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk In Re: The Complaint of Omega Protein, Incorporated, as Owner and Operator of Fishing Vessel Isle Derniere, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability. OMEGA PROTEIN, INCORPORATED, as Owner and Operator of Fishing Vessel Isle Derniere, Plaintiff–Appellant, versus CHARLES BRUMFIELD, JR.; ROBERT LANCELIN, Sr., Defendants–Appellees. No. 15-31060 In Re: The Complaint of Omega Protein, Incorporated, as Owner and Operator of Fishing Vessel Isle Derniere, for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability. OMEGA PROTEIN, INCORPORATED, as Owner and Operator of Fishing Vessel Isle Derniere, Plaintiff–Appellant, versus ANTHONY SCOTT; ROBERT LANCELIN, SR., Defendants–Appellants,  Case: 15-31032 Document: 00513834787 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/13/2017 versus LOUISIANA MARINE TOWING, L.L.C., Defendant–Appellee. In re: The Complaint of LOUISIANA MARINE TOWING, L.L.C., as Owner of the M/V Lady Lauren, Its Engines, Gear, Tackle, etc., for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability. LOUISIANA MARINE TOWING, L.L.C., as Owner of the M/V Lady Lauren, Its Engines, Gear, Tackle, etc., Plaintiff–Appellee, versus ANTHONY SCOTT; ROBERT LANCELIN, SR.; OMEGA PROTEIN INCORPORATED, Defendants–Appellants. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana No. 6:14-CV-469 Before JOLLY, SMITH, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * * Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. 2  Case: 15-31032 Document: 00513834787 Page: 3 Date Filed: 01/13/2017 In this matter stemming from an allision between two vessels, the dis- trict court awarded damages and determined the value of a vessel. Various parties seek relief on appeal. This case was tried thoroughly and patiently by the district court. We have read the briefs and applicable parts of the record and the relevant law and have heard the oral arguments of five attorneys. There is no reversible error. The judgment and underlying decisions are fair. The judgment as to all parties and all issues is AFFIRMED. 3