Filed: Jun. 21, 2006
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 21, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-31027 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SANTOS CANDELO-MOSQUERA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:04-CR-60041-ALL - Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appo
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 21, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 05-31027 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus SANTOS CANDELO-MOSQUERA, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 6:04-CR-60041-ALL - Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appoi..
More
United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
F I L E D
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 21, 2006
Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
No. 05-31027
Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
SANTOS CANDELO-MOSQUERA,
Defendant-Appellant.
--------------------
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 6:04-CR-60041-ALL
--------------------
Before STEWART, DENNIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Santos
Candelo-Mosquera (Candelo) has moved for leave to withdraw and
has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Candelo has not filed a response to
counsel’s motion. Our independent review of the brief and the
record discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal. Accordingly,
counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.
No. 05-31027
-2-
excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.