Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Armas, 06-20497 (2007)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 06-20497 Visitors: 24
Filed: Feb. 14, 2007
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT February 14, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 06-20497 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus DANIEL HERNANDEZ ARMAS, Defendant-Appellant. - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:95-CR-172-5 - Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appo
More
                                                         United States Court of Appeals
                                                                  Fifth Circuit
                                                                F I L E D
                 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                         FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT                 February 14, 2007

                                                             Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                     Clerk
                              No. 06-20497
                          Conference Calendar


UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                       Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus

DANIEL HERNANDEZ ARMAS,

                                       Defendant-Appellant.

                         --------------------
             Appeal from the United States District Court
                  for the Southern District of Texas
                        USDC No. 4:95-CR-172-5
                         --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, GARZA, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

     The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Daniel

Hernandez Armas has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a

brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967).   Hernandez Armas has not filed a response to counsel’s

motion.   Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issues for appeal.     Accordingly,

counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS

DISMISSED.     See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


     *
       Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that
this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except
under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer