Filed: Oct. 21, 2011
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: Case: 11-10093 Document: 00511640060 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 21, 2011 No. 11-10093 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CHADWICK DARAY HEATH, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:09-CR-329-3 Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
Summary: Case: 11-10093 Document: 00511640060 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED October 21, 2011 No. 11-10093 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. CHADWICK DARAY HEATH, Defendant-Appellant Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:09-CR-329-3 Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. P..
More
Case: 11-10093 Document: 00511640060 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
October 21, 2011
No. 11-10093
Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
CHADWICK DARAY HEATH,
Defendant-Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Texas
USDC No. 3:09-CR-329-3
Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The attorney appointed to represent Chadwick Daray Heath has moved
for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores,
632 F.3d 229 (5th
Cir. 2011). Heath has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief
and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with
counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate
review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED,
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.
Case: 11-10093 Document: 00511640060 Page: 2 Date Filed: 10/21/2011
No. 11-10093
counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS
DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.
2