Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Henson, 08-31068 (2009)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit Number: 08-31068 Visitors: 23
Filed: Sep. 10, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 10, 2009 No. 08-31068 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARLONDO K. HENSON, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana No. 6:08-CR-132-1 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Arl
More
           IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
                    FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT  United States Court of Appeals
                                                    Fifth Circuit

                                                 FILED
                                                                        September 10, 2009
                                     No. 08-31068
                                   Summary Calendar                    Charles R. Fulbruge III
                                                                               Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                   Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ARLONDO K. HENSON,

                                                   Defendant-Appellant.


                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                      for the Western District of Louisiana
                                No. 6:08-CR-132-1


Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
       The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Arlondo Henson has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California, 
386 U.S. 738
(1967). Henson has filed a response. Our independent
review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Henson’s response disclose no non-
frivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the ap-
peal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

       *
         Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer