Filed: Sep. 10, 2009
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 10, 2009 No. 08-31068 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARLONDO K. HENSON, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana No. 6:08-CR-132-1 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Arl
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED September 10, 2009 No. 08-31068 Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ARLONDO K. HENSON, Defendant-Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana No. 6:08-CR-132-1 Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Arlo..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
September 10, 2009
No. 08-31068
Summary Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III
Clerk
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ARLONDO K. HENSON,
Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
No. 6:08-CR-132-1
Before DAVIS, SMITH, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Arlondo Henson has
moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v.
California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967). Henson has filed a response. Our independent
review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Henson’s response disclose no non-
frivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is
GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the ap-
peal is DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .
R. 47.5.4.