Filed: Nov. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-50410 Document: 00512044602 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/06/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 6, 2012 No. 11-50410 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk ADRIAN COVARRUBIAS, Petitioner-Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; WARDEN, REEVES COUNTY DETENTION CENTER III; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL; BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondents-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the W
Summary: Case: 11-50410 Document: 00512044602 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/06/2012 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED November 6, 2012 No. 11-50410 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk ADRIAN COVARRUBIAS, Petitioner-Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; WARDEN, REEVES COUNTY DETENTION CENTER III; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL; BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondents-Appellees Appeal from the United States District Court for the We..
More
Case: 11-50410 Document: 00512044602 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/06/2012
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals
Fifth Circuit
FILED
November 6, 2012
No. 11-50410
Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce
Clerk
ADRIAN COVARRUBIAS,
Petitioner-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; WARDEN, REEVES COUNTY DETENTION
CENTER III; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., U. S. ATTORNEY GENERAL; BUREAU
OF PRISONS,
Respondents-Appellees
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Texas
USDC No. 4:10-CV-101
Before BENAVIDES, HAYNES, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Adrian Covarrubias, former federal prisoner # 94612-179, appeals the
denial of his 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 petition challenging his exclusion from
rehabilitation programs and halfway houses. As Covarrubias has been released
from Bureau of Prisons custody, we dismiss his appeal as moot. See Calderon
v. Moore,
518 U.S. 149, 150 (1996).
APPEAL DISMISSED.
*
Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not
be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.
R. 47.5.4.