Filed: Jul. 11, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-30351 Conference Calendar ISAAC OGUGUO, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, NANCY HOOKS, TERRY W. BALLENTINE, JOYCE L. RICHARD, CRAIG A. HARLOW, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CV-1829 - - - - - - - - - - June 28, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* I
Summary: IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT No. 96-30351 Conference Calendar ISAAC OGUGUO, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, NANCY HOOKS, TERRY W. BALLENTINE, JOYCE L. RICHARD, CRAIG A. HARLOW, Defendants-Appellees. - - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC No. 95-CV-1829 - - - - - - - - - - June 28, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Is..
More
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-30351
Conference Calendar
ISAAC OGUGUO,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE,
NANCY HOOKS, TERRY W. BALLENTINE,
JOYCE L. RICHARD, CRAIG A. HARLOW,
Defendants-Appellees.
- - - - - - - - - -
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Western District of Louisiana
USDC No. 95-CV-1829
- - - - - - - - - -
June 28, 1996
Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Isaac Oguguo, # 14338-039, appeals the dismissal for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction of his application for habeas corpus
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Oguguo alleges he cannot lawfully
be detained for deportation proceedings while his criminal
conviction is pending on direct appeal. Oguguo’s conviction is
no longer pending on direct appeal. See Oguguo v. United States,
*
Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined
that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent
except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule
47.5.4.
No. 96-30351
- 2 -
116 S. Ct. 580 (Mem.) (1995), reh’g denied,
116 S. Ct. 830 (Mem)
(1996). There is no longer a basis for his requested relief and
the appeal is dismissed as moot.
DISMISSED.