Filed: Oct. 07, 1996
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: _ No. 95-2169 _ Will Elliot Clark * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western Bill Armontrout; Donald Cline; * District of Missouri. Phillip Vance, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellees. * _ Submitted: September 13, 1996 Filed: October 7, 1996 _ Before McMILLIAN, MAGILL, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, petitioner alleged various violations of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constit
Summary: _ No. 95-2169 _ Will Elliot Clark * * Appellant, * * v. * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the Western Bill Armontrout; Donald Cline; * District of Missouri. Phillip Vance, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellees. * _ Submitted: September 13, 1996 Filed: October 7, 1996 _ Before McMILLIAN, MAGILL, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. In this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, petitioner alleged various violations of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitu..
More
___________
No. 95-2169
___________
Will Elliot Clark *
*
Appellant, *
*
v. * Appeal from the United States
* District Court for the Western
Bill Armontrout; Donald Cline; * District of Missouri.
Phillip Vance, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: September 13, 1996
Filed: October 7, 1996
___________
Before McMILLIAN, MAGILL, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
In this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, petitioner alleged
various violations of the Eighth Amendment to the United States
Constitution relating to supposedly unsanitary conditions in the Jefferson
City Correctional Center. Petitioner prevailed at his first trial, and the
jury awarded him nominal damages of $1.00. We remanded for a new trial in
light of Farmer v. Brennan,
511 U.S. 825 (1994). See Clark v. Armontrout,
28 F.3d 71 (8th Cir. 1994) (per curiam). At the petitioner's second trial,
the jury found for the defendants. The district court1 denied petitioner's
motion for a new trial. In the present appeal, petitioner argues that the
1
The Honorable Scott O. Wright, United States District Judge
for the Western District of Missouri.
trial court committed reversible error regarding several evidentiary points
and claims that defense counsel's conduct warrants a new trial.
We have read the record carefully and discern no legal error. We
therefore affirm the judgment of the district court.
A true copy.
Attest:
CLERK, U. S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
-2-