Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Samuel Hernandez v. RRRB, 96-3119 (1997)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 96-3119 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 10, 1997
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: _ No. 96-3119 _ Samuel Hernandez, * * Petitioner, * * On Petition for Review of the v. * Decision of the Railroad * Retirement Board. Railroad Retirement Board, * * Respondent. * [UNPUBLISHED] _ Submitted: January 6, 1997 Filed: January 10, 1997 _ Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Samuel Hernandez petitions this court for review of the final decision of the Railroad Retirement Board that he is no longer entitled to have his annuity calculated under th
More
                                     ___________

                                     No. 96-3119
                                     ___________

Samuel Hernandez,                         *
                                          *
              Petitioner,                 *
                                          *   On Petition for Review of the
     v.                                   *   Decision of the Railroad
                                          *   Retirement Board.
Railroad Retirement Board,                *
                                          *
              Respondent.                 *   [UNPUBLISHED]


                                     ___________

                        Submitted:   January 6, 1997

                            Filed:   January 10, 1997
                                     ___________

Before BEAM, HANSEN, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
                               ___________

PER CURIAM.


     Samuel Hernandez petitions this court for review of the final
decision of the Railroad Retirement Board that he is no longer entitled to
have his annuity calculated under the special guaranty provision of the
Railroad Retirement Act.      45 U.S.C. ยง 231b(f)(3). We find no error of law
and conclude the Board's decision is supported by substantial evidence.
Accordingly, we affirm.      See 8th Cir. R. 47B.


     A true copy.


              Attest:


                   CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer