Filed: Jun. 21, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-3333 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Martin Gonzalez Valdez, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * _ Submitted: June 16, 2004 Filed: June 21, 2004 _ Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Martin Gonzalez Valdez pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute over 500 grams of a mixture containing methamphetamine, in violati
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 03-3333 _ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * District of Nebraska. Martin Gonzalez Valdez, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. * _ Submitted: June 16, 2004 Filed: June 21, 2004 _ Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Martin Gonzalez Valdez pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute over 500 grams of a mixture containing methamphetamine, in violatio..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 03-3333
___________
United States of America, *
*
Appellee, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the
* District of Nebraska.
Martin Gonzalez Valdez, *
* [UNPUBLISHED]
Appellant. *
___________
Submitted: June 16, 2004
Filed: June 21, 2004
___________
Before MELLOY, HANSEN, and COLLOTON, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Martin Gonzalez Valdez pleaded guilty to conspiring to distribute over 500
grams of a mixture containing methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
§§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(A), and 846. The district court1 sentenced him to 135 months
imprisonment and 5 years supervised release. On appeal, counsel has moved to
withdraw and filed a brief under Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967).
1
The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of Nebraska.
Having reviewed the record independently under Penson v. Ohio,
488 U.S. 75
(1988), we find no nonfrivolous issues. Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to
withdraw, and we affirm.
______________________________
-2-