Filed: Sep. 08, 2004
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-1550 _ Donald D. Nelson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Northern * District of Iowa. Thomas J. Vilsack, Governor; * Tim Hurley, Mayor; Mike Kubick, * [UNPUBLISHED] Sheriff, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: September 2, 2004 Filed: September 8, 2004 _ Before WOLLMAN, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Iowa inmate Donald Nelson (Nelson) appeals the district court’s1 preservice
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 04-1550 _ Donald D. Nelson, * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Northern * District of Iowa. Thomas J. Vilsack, Governor; * Tim Hurley, Mayor; Mike Kubick, * [UNPUBLISHED] Sheriff, * * Appellees. * _ Submitted: September 2, 2004 Filed: September 8, 2004 _ Before WOLLMAN, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Iowa inmate Donald Nelson (Nelson) appeals the district court’s1 preservice ..
More
United States Court of Appeals
FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
___________
No. 04-1550
___________
Donald D. Nelson, *
*
Appellant, *
* Appeal from the United States
v. * District Court for the Northern
* District of Iowa.
Thomas J. Vilsack, Governor; *
Tim Hurley, Mayor; Mike Kubick, * [UNPUBLISHED]
Sheriff, *
*
Appellees. *
___________
Submitted: September 2, 2004
Filed: September 8, 2004
___________
Before WOLLMAN, McMILLIAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
___________
PER CURIAM.
Iowa inmate Donald Nelson (Nelson) appeals the district court’s1 preservice
dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Having carefully reviewed the record de
novo, see Moore v. Sims,
200 F.3d 1170, 1171 (8th Cir. 2000) (per curiam), we
conclude the district court properly dismissed the complaint, see 28 U.S.C.
§ 2254(b)(1)(A); Heck v. Humphrey,
512 U.S. 477, 486-87 (1994); West v. Atkins,
1
The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, Chief Judge, United States District Court
for the Northern District of Iowa.
487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988); Preiser v. Rodriguez,
411 U.S. 475, 499-500 (1973).
However, we believe the dismissal should be without prejudice. See Sheldon v.
Hundley,
83 F.3d 231, 234 (8th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, we modify the district
court’s judgment to be without prejudice, and affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also
deny Nelson’s request for appointment of appellate counsel.
______________________________
-2-