Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Jon David Brooks v. United States, 05-2838 (2005)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 05-2838 Visitors: 72
Filed: Nov. 09, 2005
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT _ No. 05-2838 _ Jon David Brooks, * * Appellant, * Appeal from the United States * District Court for the District v. * of Minnesota. * United States of America, * [UNPUBLISHED] * Appellee. * _ Submitted: November 3, 2005 Filed: November 9, 2005 _ Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Jon David Brooks filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate Brooks's sentence based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Blakely v. Washing
More
                     United States Court of Appeals
                            FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT
                                    ___________

                                    No. 05-2838
                                    ___________

Jon David Brooks,                        *
                                         *
                    Appellant,           * Appeal from the United States
                                         * District Court for the District
      v.                                 * of Minnesota.
                                         *
United States of America,                *       [UNPUBLISHED]
                                         *
                    Appellee.            *
                                    ___________

                              Submitted: November 3, 2005
                                 Filed: November 9, 2005
                                  ___________

Before ARNOLD, FAGG, and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
                           ___________

PER CURIAM.


      Jon David Brooks filed a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate Brooks's sentence
based on the Supreme Court’s decision in Blakely v. Washington, 
542 U.S. 296
(2004). The district court* denied relief, but granted a certificate of appealability on
whether the ruling in Blakely--and now United States v. Booker, 
125 S. Ct. 738
(2005)--applies retroactively to cases on collateral review. The rule announced in
Booker does not apply to final criminal judgments on collateral review. See Never

      *
      The Honorable John R. Tunheim, United States District Judge for the District
of Minnesota.
Misses A Shot v. United States, 
413 F.3d 781
, 783-84 (8th Cir. 2005) (per curiam).
Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                      ______________________________




                                       -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer