Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Erin Jessica Eiler v. Avera McKennan Hospital, 16-1979 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 16-1979 Visitors: 48
Filed: Jan. 04, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-1979 _ Erin Jessica Eiler, lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant, v. Avera McKennan Hospital; Treating Medical Personnel, lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees. _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls _ Submitted: December 27, 2016 Filed: January 4, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Erin Eiler appeals the district co
More
                 United States Court of Appeals
                            For the Eighth Circuit
                        ___________________________

                                No. 16-1979
                        ___________________________

                                 Erin Jessica Eiler,

                      lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant,

                                          v.

            Avera McKennan Hospital; Treating Medical Personnel,

                     lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees.
                                      ____________

                    Appeal from United States District Court
                  for the District of South Dakota - Sioux Falls
                                  ____________

                         Submitted: December 27, 2016
                            Filed: January 4, 2017
                                [Unpublished]
                                ____________

Before COLLOTON, MURPHY, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________

PER CURIAM.

       Erin Eiler appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of her pro se complaint
alleging medical malpractice, libel, and slander. Upon careful review, we find no

      1
       The Honorable Lawrence L. Piersol, United States District Judge for the
District of South Dakota.
basis for reversal because, among other reasons, we agree with the district court that
it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1); Key Med. Supply,
Inc. v. Burwell, 
764 F.3d 955
, 961 (8th Cir. 2014) (de novo review), as Eiler did not
raise a question of federal law or cite to a federal statute, see 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and
did not allege an amount in controversy sufficient for diversity jurisdiction, see 28
U.S.C. § 1332. Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th
Cir. R. 47B.
                        ______________________________




                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer