Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Dennis Deters v. Federal Aviation Admin., 16-3727 (2017)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 16-3727 Visitors: 73
Filed: May 24, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 16-3727 _ Dennis Deters lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner v. Federal Aviation Administration lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent _ Petition for Review of an Order of the Federal Aviation Administration _ Submitted: May 19, 2017 Filed: May 24, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Minnesota resident Dennis Deters petitions this Court for review after the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) deni
More
                  United States Court of Appeals
                             For the Eighth Circuit
                         ___________________________

                                 No. 16-3727
                         ___________________________

                                    Dennis Deters

                              lllllllllllllllllllllPetitioner

                                            v.

                          Federal Aviation Administration

                             lllllllllllllllllllllRespondent
                                     ____________

                       Petition for Review of an Order of the
                          Federal Aviation Administration
                                   ____________

                              Submitted: May 19, 2017
                                Filed: May 24, 2017
                                   [Unpublished]
                                   ____________

Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and RILEY, Circuit Judges.
                       ____________

PER CURIAM.

       Minnesota resident Dennis Deters petitions this Court for review after the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) denied him a medical certificate needed to
re-establish his private pilot’s license. He has also filed a motion to supplement the
record.
      We have reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, and we conclude that
the FAA’s decision was not arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or without
support in the law. See Reder v. Adm’r of FAA, 
116 F.3d 1261
, 1263 (8th Cir. 1997)
(standard of review). We deny the petition for review and deny as moot Deters’s
motion to supplement the record.
                       ______________________________




                                        -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer