Filed: Dec. 12, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1942 _ Donnie Ray Dumas lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Matthew A. Falkner; Gary L. Broyles lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City _ Submitted: December 7, 2017 Filed: December 12, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Donnie Ray Dumas appeals after the District Court1 gr
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-1942 _ Donnie Ray Dumas lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Matthew A. Falkner; Gary L. Broyles lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City _ Submitted: December 7, 2017 Filed: December 12, 2017 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Donnie Ray Dumas appeals after the District Court1 gra..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-1942
___________________________
Donnie Ray Dumas
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Matthew A. Falkner; Gary L. Broyles
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: December 7, 2017
Filed: December 12, 2017
[Unpublished]
____________
Before GRUENDER, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Donnie Ray Dumas appeals after the District Court1 granted summary judgment
to defendants in his action brought under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of
1
The Honorable Stephen R. Bough, United States District Judge for the
Western District of Missouri.
Fed. Bureau of Narcotics,
403 U.S. 388 (1971). Viewing the summary judgment
record in the light most favorable to Dumas and drawing all reasonable inferences in
his favor, we agree with the District Court that summary judgment was warranted.
See Clay v. Credit Bureau Enters., Inc.,
754 F.3d 535, 539 (8th Cir. 2014) (standard
of review). We further conclude that the court did not err in denying Dumas’s motion
to add a habeas claim against the United States Parole Commission. See Kozlov v.
Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc.,
818 F.3d 380, 394–95 (8th Cir. 2016) (standard
of review). We affirm the judgment.
______________________________
-2-