Filed: Jul. 17, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2912 _ Corey Jemell Rogers lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Steven Brouk; John Layton; Donald Hale; John Schneedle; Cindy Griffith; Alan Earls lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: July 6, 2018 Filed: July 17, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Corey Rogers app
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2912 _ Corey Jemell Rogers lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Steven Brouk; John Layton; Donald Hale; John Schneedle; Cindy Griffith; Alan Earls lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis _ Submitted: July 6, 2018 Filed: July 17, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Corey Rogers appe..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-2912
___________________________
Corey Jemell Rogers
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Steven Brouk; John Layton; Donald Hale; John Schneedle; Cindy Griffith; Alan Earls
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis
____________
Submitted: July 6, 2018
Filed: July 17, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before LOKEN, BOWMAN, and GRUENDER, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Corey Rogers appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary
judgment in his pro se 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, in which he raises claims of
excessive force, deliberate indifference to his medical needs, and sexual assault.
1
The Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh, Jr., United States District Judge for the
Eastern District of Missouri.
After careful review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we
conclude that the district court properly granted summary judgment. See Peterson v.
Kopp,
754 F.3d 594, 598 (8th Cir. 2014) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de
novo; viewing record in light most favorable to nonmoving party). The judgment is
affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
______________________________
-2-