Filed: Aug. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2786 _ Lawrence Alan Goldblatt lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Ocwen Financial Corporation; Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City _ Submitted: August 3, 2018 Filed: August 8, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Lawrence Goldblatt appeals foll
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 17-2786 _ Lawrence Alan Goldblatt lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant v. Ocwen Financial Corporation; Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City _ Submitted: August 3, 2018 Filed: August 8, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Lawrence Goldblatt appeals follo..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 17-2786
___________________________
Lawrence Alan Goldblatt
lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant
v.
Ocwen Financial Corporation; Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC
lllllllllllllllllllll Defendants - Appellees
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the Western District of Missouri - Kansas City
____________
Submitted: August 3, 2018
Filed: August 8, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before WOLLMAN, BOWMAN, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Lawrence Goldblatt appeals following the district court’s1 Fed. R. Civ. P.
12(b)(6) dismissal of his complaint asserting a wrongful foreclosure claim. Having
1
The Honorable Beth Phillips, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Missouri.
carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ filings, see United States ex rel.
Ambrosecchia v. Paddock Labs., LLC,
855 F.3d 949, 954 (8th Cir. 2017) (dismissal
under Rule 12(b)(6) is reviewed de novo)), we affirm for the reasons stated in the
district court’s orders. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. Goldblatt’s motion to file a supplemental
brief and motion to stay are denied as moot.
______________________________
-2-