Filed: Nov. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-1682 _ Ruth Richter lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha _ Submitted: October 30, 2018 Filed: November 5, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Ruth Richter appeals from the order of the District Court1 granting
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 18-1682 _ Ruth Richter lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha _ Submitted: October 30, 2018 Filed: November 5, 2018 [Unpublished] _ Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Ruth Richter appeals from the order of the District Court1 granting t..
More
United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________
No. 18-1682
___________________________
Ruth Richter
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________
Appeal from United States District Court
for the District of Nebraska - Omaha
____________
Submitted: October 30, 2018
Filed: November 5, 2018
[Unpublished]
____________
Before COLLOTON, BOWMAN, and KELLY, Circuit Judges.
____________
PER CURIAM.
Ruth Richter appeals from the order of the District Court1 granting the Social
Security Administration Commissioner’s motion to dismiss her civil action arising
1
The Honorable Richard G. Kopf, United States District Judge for the District
of Nebraska.
from the 1999 termination of her supplemental security income. We have thoroughly
reviewed the record and find no error warranting reversal. See Jenkins v. Kansas City
Mo. Sch. Dist.,
516 F.3d 1074, 1080 (8th Cir. 2008) (“We review issues of subject
matter jurisdiction de novo.”). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment. See 8th Cir. R.
47B. We deny as moot the Commissioner’s pending motion to dismiss.
______________________________
-2-