Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Peter R. Wright v. Judge Frank Magill, 19-1480 (2019)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit Number: 19-1480 Visitors: 13
Filed: Oct. 07, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit _ No. 19-1480 _ Peter R. Wright lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant v. Judge Frank Magill; Hennepin County 4th District Court lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees _ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Minnesota _ Submitted: October 2, 2019 Filed: October 7, 2019 [Unpublished] _ Before GRUENDER, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. _ PER CURIAM. Peter Wright appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his c
More
              United States Court of Appeals
                        For the Eighth Circuit
                    ___________________________

                            No. 19-1480
                    ___________________________

                               Peter R. Wright

                    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                       v.

          Judge Frank Magill; Hennepin County 4th District Court

                  lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees
                                   ____________

                 Appeal from United States District Court
                      for the District of Minnesota
                              ____________

                        Submitted: October 2, 2019
                         Filed: October 7, 2019
                             [Unpublished]
                             ____________

Before GRUENDER, STRAS, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.
                          ____________

PER CURIAM.
       Peter Wright appeals the district court’s1 dismissal of his civil action raising
claims related to an unsuccessful action he brought in state court. After careful
review of the record and the parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that dismissal
was proper. See Mireles v. Waco, 
502 U.S. 9
, 11-12 (1991) (per curiam) (discussing
judicial immunity); Harris v. Mo. Court of Appeals, 
787 F.2d 427
, 429 (8th Cir.
1986) (stating that state courts possess Eleventh Amendment immunity).
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                       ______________________________




      1
       The Honorable John R. Tunheim, Chief Judge, United States District Court for
the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable
Steven E. Rau, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

                                         -2-

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer