Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Emmanual Blaz Mrkonjic-Ruzic v. United States, 22108 (1969)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Number: 22108 Visitors: 14
Filed: Apr. 01, 1969
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 402 F.2d 836 Emmanual Blaz MRKONJIC-RUZIC, Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. No. 22108. United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. Oct. 24, 1968, Rehearing Denied Dec. 2, 1968, Judgment Vacated April 1, 1969, See 89 S. Ct. 1222 . Gregory S. Stout (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellant. Wm. Shubb (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., John P. .hyland, U.S Atty., Sacramento, Cal., Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee. Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circ
More

402 F.2d 836

Emmanual Blaz MRKONJIC-RUZIC, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 22108.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Oct. 24, 1968, Rehearing Denied Dec. 2, 1968, Judgment
Vacated April 1, 1969, See 89 S. Ct. 1222.

Gregory S. Stout (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.

Wm. Shubb (argued), Asst. U.S. Atty., John P. .hyland, U.S Atty., Sacramento, Cal., Cecil F. Poole, U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.

Before CHAMBERS, HAMLEY and MERRILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant was properly charged. Conerly v. United States, 350 F.2d 679 (9th Cir. 1965).

2

Appellant's answer in the negative in response to an inquiry constituted a false representation under 18 U.S.C. 1001. Tzantarmas v. United States, 402 F.2d 163 (9th Cir. 1968); Brandow v. United States,268 F.2d 559 (9th Cir. 1959).

3

Appellant was not deprived of a fair trial by reason of the District Court's response to provocative conduct on the part of appellant's trial counsel.

4

Judgment affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer