Filed: Nov. 01, 2016
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 01 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-30108 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:14-cr-00020-SPW v. MEMORANDUM* RODNEY TOMMIE STEWART, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 25, 2016** Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. The government appeal
Summary: FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 01 2016 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-30108 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:14-cr-00020-SPW v. MEMORANDUM* RODNEY TOMMIE STEWART, Defendant-Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding Submitted October 25, 2016** Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges. The government appeals..
More
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 01 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-30108
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:14-cr-00020-SPW
v.
MEMORANDUM*
RODNEY TOMMIE STEWART,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Susan P. Watters, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 25, 2016**
Before: LEAVY, GRABER, and CHRISTEN, Circuit Judges.
The government appeals from the district court’s order granting Rodney
Tommie Stewart’s motion to dismiss his indictment for domestic assault by a
habitual offender under 18 U.S.C. § 117(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1291, and we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
The district court dismissed the indictment on the ground that the
government could not use Stewart’s uncounseled tribal court convictions to prove
an element of the offense. After the district court’s decision, the Supreme Court
decided that the use of uncounseled tribal court convictions is permissible in a
prosecution under section 117. See United States v. Bryant,
136 S. Ct. 1954, 1966
(2016). We agree with the parties that remand is required under Bryant.
Accordingly, we reverse the district court’s order dismissing Stewart’s indictment
and remand for further proceedings.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
2 14-30108