Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

91-1010 (1991)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit Number: 91-1010 Visitors: 56
Filed: May 24, 1991
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: 933 F.2d 1019 Unpublished Disposition NOTICE: Tenth Circuit Rule 36.3 states that unpublished opinions and orders and judgments have no precedential value and shall not be cited except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Douglas Trent BURNS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Tracey PORTIER, El Paso County Commissioners, James D. Munger, David Spence, Larry Martin, Arapahoe County Commissioners, Robert R. Gallagher, Jr., and James Peters,
More

933 F.2d 1019

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Tenth Circuit Rule 36.3 states that unpublished opinions and orders and judgments have no precedential value and shall not be cited except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Douglas Trent BURNS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Tracey PORTIER, El Paso County Commissioners, James D.
Munger, David Spence, Larry Martin, Arapahoe
County Commissioners, Robert R.
Gallagher, Jr., and James
Peters, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-1010.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

May 24, 1991.

Before LOGAN, MOORE and BALDOCK, Circuit Judges.

ORDER AND JUDGMENT*

JOHN P. MOORE, Circuit Judge.

1

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

2

This is an appeal from the dismissal of plaintiff's pro se 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 complaint for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the briefs and the record and conclude the district court properly adopted the recommendations of the magistrate. Accordingly, the judgment is AFFIRMED substantially for the reasons set forth in the recommendations dated February 20, 1990. The mandate shall issue forthwith.

*

This order and judgment has no precedential value and shall not be cited, or used by any court within the Tenth Circuit, except for purposes of establishing the doctrines of the law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. 10th Cir.R. 36.3

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer